The non-sacral sect model views culture as something that is at best inevitably corrupt (and thus to some degree a thing indifferent), and at worst a subversive danger to the Kingdom. This must be juxtaposed with the sacral-institutional model that views culture as something to be mastered, shaped, and controlled. When I say 'indifferent', this is not to suggest that it can be used expansively or with abandon. On the contrary our interactions with it must be marked by caution and even cynicism - and yet without fear. Such wisdom and occasionalism prove difficult and thus many have (in the spirit of the Pharisees) erected the Legalist Wall as a means of protection - a move that is ultimately corrosive in that in addition to being unbiblical it has the tendency to shut down the spiritual faculties of discernment instead relying on a kind of checklist spirituality wed to a (fundamentally flawed) cultural narrative.
Calling for a Return to the Doctrinal Ideals and Kingdom Ethics of the First Reformation
Showing posts with label Institutionalisation of the Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Institutionalisation of the Church. Show all posts
22 May 2024
Inbox: The Church as Institution vs. Sect (I)
What of those who insist it's
wrong for the Church to be viewed as a sect? Is it an institution? Is
it right for us to think of it in such terms?
Over the past several years I've heard more than one statement or discussion regarding the question of the Church needing to function as an institution or fixture within society and not fall into the category of being a sect and it connotations of marginalisation, exclusivity, and even extremism. The acceleration and amplification of the culture wars and the perceived marginalisation of the Church has fueled this discussion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)