20 November 2023

Conspiracies versus Conspiracy as a Worldview: The Epistemological and Ethical Rot of Libertarianism (III)

Due to the necessity of expansion and sheer avarice, Capitalism will inevitably turn to the international sphere and with that comes intrigue and war – and that in turn leads to secrecy and propaganda. As the public begins to grasp this, there is an erosion of trust. And if the forces of finance capital have also purchased the news media – the end result is at first mass conformity, but later this will turn to mass cynicism. For those who only see one small piece of the puzzle their already skewed viewpoint will be subject to easy manipulation. There are those who profit from fear and anger and if allowed to fester these emotional responses can take on a life of their own. And it's not just the Right that plays this game.


Globalism would inevitably lead to bigger and more widespread outbreaks of disease – something like Covid was actually long overdue. But for many Libertarians they had reached a point in which they no longer trusted anything institutional. In many respects I don't either but I also know the powers that be don't want to harm their bottom line and (as already stated) things like lockdowns and vaccine mandates were not about social control per se but an attempt to get the situation under control so that all of us wage-slaves can get back to work and get the economy moving – which translates into their pockets being lined with gold. As with all things on a large-scale it was a mess and competing interests generated no small degree of chaos.

But for Libertarians it was all conspiracy. You can't trust the government, you can't trust science, and you can't trust history – again, I have a degree of sympathy will all of this but it has to be tempered. It requires wisdom to navigate this and apart from Scripture, history is probably the most helpful guide. But history is not something that can be pursued on the Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, or Bret Baier level – or even the Rachel Maddow or Anderson Cooper level for that matter. A five-minute PragerU video is not going to give you depth and wisdom. There are no shortcuts, it requires a great deal of investment in terms of time and patience and as such the American public is not interested.

For some during the Covid crisis, the ruling figures that appear on television were transformed into complete frauds – not just immoral people pretending to be moral, not just scheming avaricious people pretending to stand for certain values or to sincerely care about this or that situation. I'll be the first to admit these people, these politicians, celebrities and those connected to the media are mostly hypocrites and frauds. They are in some respects the most vile people on Earth.

But that doesn't mean everything they say is false or utterly a lie. They frame things in a self-serving manner. They manipulate stories but most of it is still true. Maybe it rests on false assumptions or they omit critical aspects of the story – and they often skip the context as it would undermine their point of view. That said, the stories that are reported are rarely altogether false. Sometimes they are, but that's not often the case and it's rare to get all the major media outlets and politicians to operate off the same script. It happens sometimes (like after 9/11) but not for very long. There's enough competition within the circles of power that overt lies will be called out and exploited. No, the lies are more often cases of omission and manipulation. From my standpoint, the disagreement is often in terms of the assumptions and the framing.

Conspiracies are real but the Conspiratorial Worldview is not and I think it's tragic to see the young woman running Catholics Against Militarism completely lose her way. She has become (in my mind) an emblem of where this kind of thinking leads.

She sees so clearly the lies surrounding war – and they are pervasive. She sees problems with the economic system – but doesn't understand them. She fears state power and tyranny but seems to lack a way to frame it or understand it in its context. It's highly problematic but not in the way she sees it. Because of suspicions surrounding Covid and the more recent trajectories in Gender-driven medicine and science there is a tendency to doubt all science and even all authority.

Again, the materialist mindset that undergirds our culture's assumptions is utterly false and it cannot create the unified theory or worldview that it hopes to discover. It cannot answer the most basic questions or give man a means to live a meaningful life. Instead it tries to sidestep these issues. That said, science has made advances of a kind. You can't doubt this, nor can the Catholic podcaster as she utilizes these technologies.

Again, how these technologies can be accounted for is problematic and what it all means or how to contextualise it is something that escapes the modern materialist. And there are many scientific claims – especially in the realm of theoretical physics and the like that can be doubted. A lot of the cutting edge science that so fascinates people is really just philosophy and some of it even qualifies as religion.

All of this is to say that we needn't fear modernity. The modern world has deep problems and yet we cannot return to the pre-modern period. I have even argued for something of a medieval worldview, a return to supernaturalism. I believe reality is metaphysical, spiritual and thus beyond the ability for us to understand and in total defiance of modern Scientism.

That said, I don't believe we need to doubt the discoveries of the scientific era. When I say return to the Middle Ages, I do not mean that we need to return to Galen, Ptolemy, and Aristotle. That was another flawed paradigm, a corrupt syncretism that the Medieval Roman Catholic Church bought into. It was false, just as today's models are in many respects false.

And so for some (like the host of Catholics Against Militarism) the answer to a world she doesn't like and doesn't understand is to retreat to these forms, to a world she deems safe – and yet it's a world that didn't really work either and thus fell apart because it was not sound or real. It professed to be Christian or Biblical and yet it wasn't. The Scriptures were read through a corrupted lens, forced to say things they didn't say.

We see this happen again with the Age of Reason and the Enlightenment – resulting in new forms of philosophical theology and a kind of scholastic rationalism that would ultimately implode resulting in theological liberalism. This in turn has led to various 'conservative' reactions meant to be correctives but in reality are just permutations of the same flawed epistemological paradigm.

As a result of all these forces at work, we're seeing a resurgence of notions like a Flat Earth or Geocentricity and it struck me as tragic to see the host of this anti-militarism podcast fall into these traps. Her confidence in the world has collapsed. The ship is sinking and so she's reaching desperately for a life boat but instead has simply found an older ship that has already capsized – or in reality that has already sunk. What she and others think is solid ground is but another death trap. She has lost her way. Her misguided commitments have led her into a state of crisis and collapse. The false worldview she embraces has come to dominate, and now she's trapped in a dark room and romanticism and fantasy are the only escape. This is why she's inviting Robert Sungenis on her show and giving him a platform for his geocentric views.

It's sobering and sad – and so terribly frustrating. I grow tired of the smug fact-checkers on the news or those who decry and denounce those who don't embrace their narratives about Russia or even the goodness of the USA as 'conspiracy theorists'. They mock the notion of the Deep State, a notion which has been around for decades and is easily embraced by the academy when it comes to other contexts that don't threaten the American order. All of this was thrown into an intensified chaos with the rise of the Trump cult and the way they employ conspiracy to explain away their failures and truths that stand in their way. As such, legitimate conspiracies have been utterly tainted and discredited and they've given birth to a new generation of conspiracy and conspiracists that are even further divorced from reality. It's as if we're living in a labyrinth so complex that even Borges would recoil in horror.

I was so sorry to see what was an otherwise interesting podcast succumb to this kind of mental rot. And now it goes on the ever-growing list of authors, podcasts, websites and even pastors and Church leaders that I must effectively write off – I'm no longer interested in anything they have to say. They have lost their way. They have been consumed by the chaos-labyrinth that is our world in the Last Days.

It's fascinating to trace out how these things develop and how people fall into these wormholes from which they cannot escape. It's sobering and humbling too.