I have often talked about the Materialist assumption at work in our culture. It is just assumed that everything that exists has some kind of scientific or physiological explanation. I heard a BBC reporter talking about the Scopes Trial and the 'teaching' of evolution. He corrected himself with the 'science of evolution' - implying that science is factual and based on actual things that can be verified while teaching is just theoretical or philosophical and thus subjective in a way 'science' is not. The poor lost man doesn't understand that science - especially as it's being understood in a Materialist framework is just as philosophically rooted and dependent as any other religious system.
Calling for a Return to the Doctrinal Ideals and Kingdom Ethics of the First Reformation
10 December 2024
Realms of Enchantment and Mystery
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/living-wonder/
I rather enjoyed reading this review though I have not decided whether I will pick up Dreher's book. The work in question is Rod Dreher's 'Living in Wonder: Finding Mystery and Meaning in a Secular Age'. I found myself disagreeing with both Dreher and Darville the reviewer, but there's a great deal of food for thought.
16 April 2022
Chimeric Experimentation and the Bioethics of the Pro-Life Movement (I)
The current Evangelical world is rife with scepticism
regarding modern medicine and yet some will remember a time in which the
attitude that long dominated the movement was very much pro-medicine and
pro-technological development. Whether right, wrong, or indifferent, the shift
is interesting and more should be done in examining the reasons behind it.
09 June 2021
Dangerous Roads in the Realm of Natural Theology
Superpositioned unity of distinct states, entanglement, dual
identity and other concepts associated with the quanta remain more than a
little intriguing. And indeed I have often thought of this realm of science as
a case of science breaking down, even
of a hint of the metaphysical imposing itself on empiricist assumptions. It has
a real value in terms of apologetics – not in what it can say, but in what it
can destroy. It casts doubt on the certainty and epistemological assumptions of
Scientism. It declares not only that there's something more and something
beyond but that these questions end in mystery and incoherence. It painfully
reveals the limitations of human epistemology.