17 January 2011

Twenty Years in Iraq

By no means do I agree with Vance on every issue, but he's a rare...an extremely rare voice in the Evangelical world. He sees the idolatry that most American Christians engage in with regard to Nationalism and the military, and the death and destruction it has led to.

And this article is just another example.



There are times when even a general morality derived from Natural Law can make a case for intervention, that is to aid another country that has been invaded, or to rescue a people being destroyed.

The thing is, one struggles to find examples of this from history. In the end, natural man doesn't work that way. I've written about this in regard to World War II. Certainly a moral case could be made for intervention on behalf of the Poles and the Jews, and sometimes governments even sell wars in this manner. Think of Vietnam.

The reality is governments are self serving and seek their own benefit. Individual soldiers might go fight for the 'higher cause' but governments lie to their own people and manipulate them into fighting for and supporting wars that are often fought for far more complex reasons...which are never altruistic. It's always about gain, and that's the way it works in a fallen world. At the end of the day Rwanda was just not important enough. For the sake of argument....we can see North Korea is now more than an irritation, but in 2003 George Bush wanted to go after Iraq. Eight years later it's clear who the threat was. Why was Iraq invaded instead? Lots of reasons....practical ones. Morally there was no case for going into Iraq that wasn't three times as severe and urgent as the situation in North Korea. But it's not about a moral case for helping people, it's about the game.

Regarding Iraq, someone might appeal to the oppression of the Kurds? Then why, just a few miles across the border in Turkey where Kurds are severely oppressed, are they called terrorists or completely ignored by the U.S. state department and 'liberal' media? Because Turkey is a NATO ally.

In Iraq they're freedom fighters, an inspiration standing against the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. In Turkey where thousands of villages sit empty and thousands of Kurds have died....nothing, no moral imperative.

My purpose is not to comment on the rights or wrongs of the Kurdish situation. I'm trying to point on the hypocrisy and self-serving orientation of American foreign policy. America is not unique in this. It's just another country playing The Great Game.

Some might say....if a country has the means to help, it has the moral duty to do so. Okay, there might be times that could be argued, but I have yet to see it actually happen. Every time contemporaries or later historians can point out what was really happening, what the real motivation was.

Obviously if a country is being invaded, the people have a right to fight back and you expect them to, but rarely does another country come to their aid for moral reasons. The world doesn't work that way. They come because it serves their mutual interests.

America's Twenty Years in Iraq was never about Kuwait and the lies our 'liberal' media told us back in 1990 and 1991. Nor was it about a real threat to the United States as our 'liberal' media told us in 2002. It's about an agenda the United States has in regard to the Middle East. It's about power. It's every bit as much about Russia, China, Iran, the EU, Israel as well as several other factors. It's about projection of power, capturing resources, and building American bases. It's about having a foothold in region to check the power of others, so they can't expand, so they can't do business.

It's the same thing in Afghanistan. If you think it was about delivering girls from a burka enforcing Taliban, then you've been sold a lie.

The United States wields tremendous power, military, political, and cultural power that largely dominates the world. When this is combined with a theological worldview that treats America as a Christian Nation, soldiers become Moral Crusaders, and the American Narrative becomes a Redemptive Tale. It's blasphemous.

The American Church is no longer a Church of sojourners, but idolaters and building the Tower of Babel. In this situation, the Church ceases to be the faithful bride and becomes a Whore (that's a theological concept) ....seducing and being seduced, giving our 'affections' to the Bestial state power which we worship, helping it build the Tower.

At present all the Republo-Christians see the dangers with regard to the state, because the party they dislike holds the White House. But my oh my, how blind they are when a Republican holds office. Happily do they sell themselves when a Bush, Reagan, or Nixon sits in Caesar's chair. Zealously do they give themselves over to the evil.

Vance may be an Arminian Baptist...but on this point he understands The Church in the World far better than the majority of Calvinists.

Here's the link to the Vance article with the text below.


The Twenty-Year War in Iraq


by Laurence M. Vance



Recently by Laurence M. Vance: Noah’s Ark and the Sanctity of Private Property

"Why should a single American die for the Emir of Kuwait?" ~ Pat Buchanan



The current war in Iraq – now near the end of its seventh year – did not really begin on March 20, 2003, when George W. Bush ordered the United States military to invade Iraq. It actually began twenty years ago on January 17, 1991, when another Bush, George H.W., ordered the United States military to invade Iraq the first time.



After getting a green light from the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, who told Saddam Hussein: "We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America," Hussein invaded Kuwait, on August 2, 1990. But even after John Kelly, the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, testified to Congress that the "United States has no commitment to defend Kuwait and the US has no intention of defending Kuwait if it is attacked by Iraq," Bush the elder sent 500,000 U.S. troops to that caldron known as the Middle East.





After imposing sanctions on Iraq in August, the United Nations in November set a date of midnight on January 16 as the deadline for Iraq to withdraw its troops from Kuwait. Congress – ignoring the Constitution and refusing to issue a declaration of war – issued a resolution authorizing the president to use military force against Iraq, "Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678." The vote was 52-47 in the Senate and 250-183 in the House. Only two Republicans in the Senate and three in the House voted against the resolution.



When Iraq failed to withdraw its troops from Kuwait by the deadline, the United States commenced bombing as Operation Desert Shield turned into Operation Desert Storm. The 88,500 tons of bombs dropped widely destroyed both military and civilian infrastructure. The U.S. ground assault, Operation Desert Sabre, begin on February 24. A cease-fire was declared four days later. For the United States, there were 148 battle deaths and 145 non-battle deaths. This means that 293 Americans did die for the emir of Kuwait. Among the dead U.S. soldiers were 15 women and 35 killed by "friendly fire." The first American casualty of the war, LCDR Scott Speicher, was actually the last of the U.S. military dead to be identified, and just a couple of years ago.





Tens of thousands of Iraqi soldiers were also killed, plus several thousand Iraqi and Kuwaiti civilians. The current war in Iraq is but a delayed campaign in the war against Iraq. During the intermission there were tensions, threats, missile strikes, enforcement of no-fly zones, bombing raids, brutal sanctions that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, infamously said to be "worth it" by U.S. ambassador to the UN (and later Secretary of State) Madeleine Albright, and a continued presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, which inflamed the Muslim world, created terrorists, and led to the attacks of 9/11.



So, what should the United States have done when one autocratic Muslim state (Iraq) invaded another autocratic Muslim state (Kuwait)? The answer is the same no matter what country invades, bombs, attacks, or threatens another country – absolutely nothing.





It is not the purpose of the U.S. government to be the policeman, security guard, mediator, and babysitter of the world. The preamble to the Constitution mentions providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty "to ourselves and our Posterity," not to the tired, poor, huddled masses, and wretched refuse on distant shores.



The United States should be a beacon of liberty, leading the world by example, and not intervening or meddling in the affairs of other countries – for any reason. Not isolationism, of course, but in the words of Thomas Jefferson: "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none," yet doing "what is right, leaving the people of Europe to act their follies and crimes among themselves, while we pursue in good faith the paths of peace and prosperity."



And as I have maintained over and over again, the U.S. military should be engaged exclusively in defending the United States, not defending other countries, and certainly not attacking, invading, or occupying them. The U.S. military should be limited to defending the United States, securing U.S. borders, guarding U.S. shores, patrolling U.S. coasts, and enforcing no-fly zones over U.S. skies instead of defending, securing, guarding, patrolling, and enforcing in other countries. To do otherwise is to pervert the purpose of the military.



The world is full of evil, and conflicts between peoples have existed since the beginning of time. The United States has neither the responsibility nor the resources to resolve every conflict and stamp out all the evil in the world. Any American concerned about oppression, human rights violations, sectarian violence, ill treatment of women, forced labor, child labor, persecution, genocide, famine, natural disasters, or injustice anywhere in the world is perfectly free to contribute his own money to or go and fight on behalf of some particular cause. Just don’t expect U.S. taxpayers to foot the bill for and U.S. soldiers to die for your cause.



Freeing Kuwait from Iraq – even if "only" 293 Americans died, even if Saddam Hussein had been deposed, even if it hadn’t resulted in brutal sanctions, even if it hadn’t led to another war, and even if it had ensured the free flow of oil at market prices – was not worth one cent from the U.S. treasury or one drop of blood from an American soldier.



January 17, 2011



Laurence M. Vance [send him mail] writes from central Florida. He is the author of Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State and The Revolution that Wasn't. His newest book is Rethinking the Good War. Visit his website.



Copyright © 2011 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

No comments: