(This is a re-post from 2011.
The title and context have been changed.) (Editorial update July 2018)
The Pharisees employed a literalistic reading of the Old Testament prophecies,
this fueling their concepts of the Kingdom and leading them to completely miss
the Messiah and the Spiritual Kingdom He was ushering in.
They misunderstood the prophets who employed Idiom meaning they
spoke in the terms of the day they lived in and the administration they were
under.
If the prophets had come along and said…be comforted people the day is coming
when the temple, the priesthood, the land, all of this will be gone and there
will be a glorious new age in which the gentiles are brought into covenant as
well….that wouldn’t have been a very popular message would it?
Instead the prophets spoke (by Divine inspiration) in the terms they knew and
their people knew. Since the entire Mosaic order was typological of Christ, the
symbolism could be used to express the spiritual realities of redemption and
the coming glory. They spoke of restoration to the land which in some contexts
was indeed about the return from exile, but it also pointed to the New Age when
the land, the dwelling place of the Shekinah, the Spirit would be where???? In
a geographical locale? No, in the hearts of the believers found in all lands,
nations and tongues. It also pointed to the Eternal Glory…the time in which the
Elect would be in full union with Christ the true Israel. So the land could be
a reference to their immediate situation under the Old Covenant, it could point
to the future New Covenant Age which Jeremiah 31 makes very clear…or it could point
to the eternal state.
The Apostles indeed spiritualize the reading of the Old Covenant. Paul employs
allegory in Galatians, Peter takes prophecies that speak of cosmic happenings
and say they are fulfilled in the resurrection, ascension, and Pentecost. James
takes prophecies concerning the restoration of Israel and the Temple and
applies it directly to the Gentile Church.
Paul in Romans 2 defines what a true Jew is…a believer in Jesus Christ. The Old
Covenant people have been set aside in Matthew 23, the kingdom taken from them
and given to another. Paul says they were blessed by their possession of the
oracles of God and he is in pain for them, but their only purpose is for the
tiny remnant of Elect among them to join the True Israel as he defines it in
Ephesians 2. In fact like Zacchaeus they need to BECOME Sons of Abraham as Paul
explains in Galatians 3….that’s what Christians are…sons of Abraham by virtue
of our union with the Seed of Promise, Jesus Christ. The fleshly children are
in bondage according to his illustration.
The New Testament defines them as the synagogue of Satan, they are enemies as
far as the gospel is concerned. We don’t boast against the branches that were
broken off from the ONE Tree, the One People of God, the Israel of God. Anti-Semitism
grew out of the desire to create a Christian Sacralist society that created a
social Monism…everyone was compelled to be on the same page. This is a grievous
error.
The bottom line is those who still look to the Jews as the people of God, those
who believe they will be restored to the land have not understood the flow of
Redemptive History. They have not understood the message of the New Testament
concerning what the Old Testament was about, what it was for and why it is gone
and can never come back. Rejecting the treatment of the Old Testament by the
Apostles and Christ they continue in the hope of the Pharisees…resting their
promises in the land and the Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord, the
Temple of the Lord (Jer. 7).
Insisting on a literalistic reading they refuse to submit to the New
Testament’s teaching concerning the Old Covenant and consequently they
spiritualize or explain away many clear teachings from the New Testament. They
build principles from the Old and cling to them tenaciously even when the New
Testament tells them those principles were in fact a misunderstanding of what
the Old was about.
When we start with the clear perspicuous passages of the New Testament, those
that are clearly didactic and not employing symbolism, alliteration, poetic
imagery or typological idiom we can establish the clear teaching of the
Apostles and build our foundations there. It is through the lens of clear
passages that we interpret those that are a bit hazy or obscured in the
language of the prophets or are sometimes even in apocalyptic modes of speech.
The irony is this school that claims to be literalistic, even though they
reject the literal teaching of the New Testament and cling to their flawed
presuppositions from the Old Testament, turns to spiritualizing and sometimes
even allegory in order to make their system work.,
For example insisting the Apocalypse is in chronological order which flies in
the face of Old Testament prophetic examples…like Daniel where we find
successive repetitious visions, each being slightly modified and emphasized
from a different angle. Additionally they allegorize the first four chapters
into Church Ages and somehow John in Revelation 4.1 becomes representative of
the whole Church and is (apparently in a vision-fulfillment of 1 Thes. 4?)
'raptured' into heaven. This represents a system overtaking the text. It is
eisegesis as opposed to any kind of principled or sound interpretation of the
text, let alone a literal one.
Because the Church is made into a sort of Redemptive-Historical Plan B, that is
to say the Kingdom promise belongs to the Jews and it was their rejection that
led to the Gentile inclusion and Church Age, the Church has to be removed in a
pre-tribulational rapture so that Plan A- The Jews in the Land- can be
reinstated. Judaism becomes once again a valid religion. This is in complete
defiance of New Testament teaching.
1 Thessalonians 4 clearly speaks of the last trumpet and the very end of all
things, yet to maintain their system, they spiritualize the 2nd Coming and make
it into a kind of partial or faux 2nd Coming and place it (this pre-Second
Coming or Rapture) 7 or more years before the actual 2nd Coming.
In Matthew 24 Jesus speaks of the destruction of the temple. Like the Old
Testament prophets he employs idiom…the end of the Old Order was in a certain
sense the end of the world. It was the end of that age, that aeon, that epoch
in history. And for the Apostles in their all too oft 'dullard' mode, that was
what they would understand…the end of the temple was the end of the world.
And in a sense at the resurrection and enthronement of Christ, the world
ended….Already and Not Yet. We are in the End Times, the final era of delay.
Everything has been accomplished by Christ. It is Finished! But God is
longsuffering, not willing that any should perish etc…. and so in this era the
Church labours as Pilgrim Citizens of Heaven living on Earth, building
the kingdom not on earth but in heaven. We lay up our treasures there, and
bring glory to our Creator by bearing witness, emulating our Saviour in
cross-bearing and rescuing the lost from the Evil One. The Holy Spirit is
finalizing the victory of Christ through the Wisdom of God at work in the
Church, glorified in the weak and pathetic sinners who persevere and overcome
evil by the Spirit’s power.
But the supposedly literalistic hermeneutic ‘reads in’ the land restoration
when Christ says nothing at all of it. The fig tree parable was just that…a
parable. If you read it carefully he’s merely making a point by appealing to
nature, there’s no basis that he was somehow speaking symbolically of an Old
Covenant-land restoration. That’s spiritualizing the passage..but not based on
a New Testament principle, instead such a reading relies on dragging forward Old
Testament presuppositions held by the Pharisees, the very notions rejected by
Christ and then later by the Apostles.
Do you want to understand what Israel is? What a Jew is? What the prophets
meant by restoration to the land, what the promise of the land was all about?
Start in the New Testament. The answer is found in Jesus Christ. In 2
Corinthians 1.20 Paul couldn't be any more clear.
All the promises are affirmed and confirmed…yea and amen in Christ Jesus. If
you miss this and misunderstand the New Testament’s teaching concerning the
Old, then you are left with a host of seemingly unfulfilled passages from the
Old Testament…ones that in order to find fulfillment must point to a future
restoration not just to the land but of Judaism itself. Missing the New
Testament’s message means that we must look to Judaism as a valid religion yet
to be restored. This is the hope of the Pharisees, the political kingdom they
never got. This position is at odds with Apostolic Christianity….It is
Judeo-Christianity and in reality a religion Paul was combating on the pages of
the New Testament. Some are inconsistent and only want take bits and pieces of
the Old Covenant and bring them forward. No, Romans is clear, it’s all our
nothing. Hebrews tells us we’re either under Moses/Levi or Melchisidec. The Old
Covenant is either still valid, or it's not. If it is, then by logical
implication the old codes are as well. The historical error has been to try and
incorporate these elements (piecemeal) into the life and worship of the Church.
Dispensationalism is unique in that at least (I suppose) it keeps the Jewish
elements with the Jews.
Of course over the years it has encountered many problems. If the New Covenant
belongs ultimately to Jews…the restoration spoken of by Jeremiah in the famous
chapter 31 passage…then why do we celebrate the Lord’s Supper? If it’s the New
Covenant meal and we the Church are not under the New Covenant, then it’s for
the future Jewish Millennium. If Jeremiah’s New Covenant promise points to the
Church…then you’ve got a problem. Because the restoration Jeremiah envisions
doesn’t then point to the land…it points to what? The Church, those in Union
with Christ. Jesus solves the issue for us in tying the New Covenant directly
to the Church.
Some older Dispensational authors saw this and actually argued that we
shouldn’t celebrate the Lord’s Supper. Some even argued that the Sermon on the
Mount was for the Jews and not the Church.
Thankfully Dispensationalism has improved and abandoned teaching different ways
of salvation and other positions along those lines, but many stubbornly cling
to certain elements of this erroneous system. Though its foundations have been
disproven and destroyed, denied even by many of their own, the eschatological
system is retained... even though it is without a foundation and without
warrant.